There are ten fatal problems with the Corman-Drosten paper which we will outline and explain in greater detail in the following sections. Original Online Review Report Corman-Drosten et al. Eurosurveillance 2020. Read Review Report Corman-Drosten et al. Eurosurveillance 2020 PDF ReviewCorman_Drosten_Paper_Final_Version_10-3-Public_final

Drosten’s name was not included in the conflicts of interests statement as one of the editors of Eurosurveillance. Drosten was turned into an overnight star after developing the real time RT- PCR test for SARS-CoV-2, which was accepted as the standard of testing by the World Health Organisation.

On January 23rd 2020 the paper was online. On January 13th 2020 version 1-0 of the protocol was published at the official WHO website [17], updated on January 17th 2020 as document version 2-1 [18], even before the Corman-Drosten paper was published on January 23rd Normally, peer review takes about 4-6 weeks. Of course, there are exceptions: The Corman-Drosten paper describing the RT-PCR test was "peer-reviewed" within 24 hours (although Eurosurveillance was not able to show us a review report). — Pieter Borger (@BorgerPieter) December 22, 2020 The team behind the review demanded that Eurosurveillance, the journal that published the original research, retract it at once, as in their view it clearly failed to meet proper standards. This is of vital importance because the Corman-Drosten paper laid the path for mass PCR testing as the main source of data on the coronavirus. eurosurveillance.org is the online home of Eurosurveillance, Europe's journal on infectious disease surveillance, epidemiology, prevention and control. Review report Corman-Drosten et al.

Eurosurveillance drosten

You can find some of their comments on our website. No officially statements from the authors of the C/D-paper. — Pieter Borger (@BorgerPieter) December 1, 2020 Review report Corman-Drosten et al. Eurosurveillance 2020. This extensive review report has been officially submitted to Eurosurveillance editorial board on 27th November 2020 via their submission-portal, enclosed to this review report is a retraction request letter, signed by all the main & co-authors. 2020-12-10 · The Drosten article was titled, “Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR” (Eurosurveillance 25(8) 2020).

Normally, peer review takes about 4-6 weeks. Of course, there are exceptions: The Corman-Drosten paper describing the RT-PCR test was "peer-reviewed" within 24 hours (although Eurosurveillance was not able to show us a review report). — Pieter Borger (@BorgerPieter) December 22, 2020

2020-11-30 A previous request from our side (Dr. P. Borger; email 26/10/2020) to the editors of “Eurosurveillance” to provide the peer review report of the Corman-Drosten paper has not been complied with. We have enclosed your email reply (dated 18/11/2020) indicating that you do not wish to disclose important information to solve this conundrum. 2020-12-16 The Drosten article was titled, “Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR” (Eurosurveillance 25(8) 2020).

Edmilson F. Oliveira-Filho, Thorsten Wolff, Janine Reiche, Eeva Broberg, Christian Drosten, Adam Meijer Eurosurveillance (IF 6.454) Pub Date : 2020- 11-19

WHOs real-time RT-PCR” (Eurosurveillance 25(8) 2020), Corman-Drosten et the Corman-Drosten paper we have identified concerning errors and Enligt Christian Drosten kan tvättbjörnshundar ( Nyctereutes 6988269 (fri fullständig text) - ( eurosurveillance.org [nått 28 december 2020]). Eurosurveillance 2001;6:151–53. Drosten C, Gunther S, Preiser W, et al.

http://www.eurosurveillance. Drost et al. Drost, V. S. 1974. Die Sarkosporidien des (Diseases/Parasites). Drost, V. S., and H. D. Graubmann. Eurosurveillance, 10(6):117-118. (Diseases/Parasites).
Familjen h bremer

Har jag hamnat Corman et al accepterades av Eurosurveillance en dag efter det att den kommit till redaktionen och Rapporten "Review report Corman-Drosten et al." har den Drosten-artikeln hade titeln, “Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR” (Eurosurveillance 25 (8) 2020).

Review report Corman-Drosten et al.
Carolina jonsson attendo

7 Dec 2020 The petition doesn't call Drosten dishonest. But it does demand that Eurosurveillance retract his group's paper for a litany of “scientific and

Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003 ; 348 ( 20 ): 1967 - 76 .

Falcon 8x

21 Oct 2020 Eeva Broberg,c Christian Drosten,a,e Adam Meijer,b Katrin Leitmeyer,c Jan Euro Surveill 25(3):pii=2000045. https://www.eurosurveillance.

Curated by an International consortium of scientists in life sciences (ICSLS) Submitted to Eurosurveillance editorial board on 27th November 2020. Cormand Rosten Review.com: Retraction request letter to Eurosurveillance editorial board The Eurosurveillance editorial board is composed of 17 associate editors and 37 editorial advisors.. The associate editors are internationally renowned and active experts in the fields of public health and clinical medicine with expertise in infectious diseases, laboratory research and diagnostics and mathematical modelling. 2021-01-17 · 18, 26 Corman Drosten Review Report.